<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The offline world still exists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/</link>
	<description>Let your true colors shine through</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:10:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Kwa</title>
		<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-7562</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Kwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 03:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrickkwa.com/?p=569#comment-7562</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ron. Yeah. I wonder, has there actually been any empirical/concrete studies done about that? Like, how many people prefer face-to-face vs online interactions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ron. Yeah. I wonder, has there actually been any empirical/concrete studies done about that? Like, how many people prefer face-to-face vs online interactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Kwa</title>
		<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-69676</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Kwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 02:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrickkwa.com/?p=569#comment-69676</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Ron. Yeah. I wonder, has there actually been any empirical/concrete studies done about that? Like, how many people prefer face-to-face vs online interactions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ron. Yeah. I wonder, has there actually been any empirical/concrete studies done about that? Like, how many people prefer face-to-face vs online interactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-7517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 02:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrickkwa.com/?p=569#comment-7517</guid>
		<description>Good point. I work with some firms that are using Back to Basics (High Touch) as a differentiator. They realize how some customers prefer the face-to-face / snail mail touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I work with some firms that are using Back to Basics (High Touch) as a differentiator. They realize how some customers prefer the face-to-face / snail mail touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-69675</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrickkwa.com/?p=569#comment-69675</guid>
		<description>Good point. I work with some firms that are using Back to Basics (High Touch) as a differentiator. They realize how some customers prefer the face-to-face / snail mail touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I work with some firms that are using Back to Basics (High Touch) as a differentiator. They realize how some customers prefer the face-to-face / snail mail touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Kwa</title>
		<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-7094</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Kwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrickkwa.com/?p=569#comment-7094</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah. Well, the danger for most of us in the internet marketing world is that lots of us are &quot;complete online junkies&quot;, so it&#039;s really easy to get trapped in the fishbowl, so to speak.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. Well, the danger for most of us in the internet marketing world is that lots of us are &#8220;complete online junkies&#8221;, so it&#8217;s really easy to get trapped in the fishbowl, so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genie</title>
		<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-7093</link>
		<dc:creator>genie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrickkwa.com/?p=569#comment-7093</guid>
		<description>yup, completely agree. at the end of the day, its still about integrated marketing. Internet and social media tools, however progressively utilized, are still one of many marketing techniques. and im personally more of a believer in perfecting the in-store customer experience, because what you look, see and touch are more tangible. and besides, unless the consumer is a complete online junkie, he/she still exists in the offline world for most part of the day (=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup, completely agree. at the end of the day, its still about integrated marketing. Internet and social media tools, however progressively utilized, are still one of many marketing techniques. and im personally more of a believer in perfecting the in-store customer experience, because what you look, see and touch are more tangible. and besides, unless the consumer is a complete online junkie, he/she still exists in the offline world for most part of the day (=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Kwa</title>
		<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-69674</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Kwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrickkwa.com/?p=569#comment-69674</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah. Well, the danger for most of us in the internet marketing world is that lots of us are &quot;complete online junkies&quot;, so it&#039;s really easy to get trapped in the fishbowl, so to speak.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. Well, the danger for most of us in the internet marketing world is that lots of us are &#8220;complete online junkies&#8221;, so it&#39;s really easy to get trapped in the fishbowl, so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genie</title>
		<link>http://derrickkwa.com/archives/the-offline-world-still-exists/comment-page-1/#comment-69673</link>
		<dc:creator>genie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derrickkwa.com/?p=569#comment-69673</guid>
		<description>yup, completely agree. at the end of the day, its still about integrated marketing. Internet and social media tools, however progressively utilized, are still one of many marketing techniques. and im personally more of a believer in perfecting the in-store customer experience, because what you look, see and touch are more tangible. and besides, unless the consumer is a complete online junkie, he/she still exists in the offline world for most part of the day (=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup, completely agree. at the end of the day, its still about integrated marketing. Internet and social media tools, however progressively utilized, are still one of many marketing techniques. and im personally more of a believer in perfecting the in-store customer experience, because what you look, see and touch are more tangible. and besides, unless the consumer is a complete online junkie, he/she still exists in the offline world for most part of the day (=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
