Does Twitter Spam Really Matter?
April 18, 2008
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting! And if there's anything else I can do for you, feel free to drop me a line.
There’s been a lot of commotion over Twitter spam lately, with Mashable’s Adam Ostrow writing that Twitter Spam has spiralled out of control. Adam goes on to suggest that “the time has arrived for Twitter to require a CAPTCHA with every new follow you want to make”.
Personally, I never really liked CAPTCHAs because of the negative impact on usability. But that’s a post for another day, I guess (Wired’s Paul Adams asked the question of whether Captcha’s moment is passing, and you can see the discussion there if you’re interested.)
The question I want to ask here is the question in the post title. Does Twitter spam really matter? Yes, it’s slightly annoying getting the random email notifications of being followed. But other than the email notifications, I personally don’t see the big deal about Twitter spam.
Twitter, by its nature, is inherently permission based, isn’t it? You choose who to follow. So how does Twitter spam fit in? Users can just choose not to follow the spammers, and that’s done, isn’t it? And based on Andre Nantel’s study, users are more or less intelligent enough to choose who to follow.
When the user controls what messages he receives, can spam really be that big an issue? Can it even be considered spam in the first place?
The second question, I don’t have a fixed answer to. But for the first question, I don’t see how spam can be such a big isssue.
What do you think? Is there something I’m missing from all of this??
[?]Popularity: 8% [?]
| 2.5 |
Posted in Technology | 
Email This Post
Trackback URL: http://derrickkwa.com/archives/does-twitter-spam-really-matter/trackback/
Previous: My Take on Fragmented Conversations | Next: Maintaining a light grip
content rss
April 19th, 2008 at 1:29 am
It doesn’t matter at all. People basically fear that the spammer achieving additional links on the back of their little slice of twitterdom somehow takes away from their legitimacy. It’s similar to a person who gets salty about a co-worker’s promotion when that co-worker did not work as hard and perhaps doesn’t deserve the new title, pay, fame, fortune, etc.
twitter spam’s last blog post..It’s not twitterspam
April 19th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Hm. Interesting point. I didn’t think about that. But yeah, I don’t really think that should be a big issue. Glad to see someone agrees with me.
April 20th, 2008 at 9:51 pm
I agree. It’s not a problem. If some spammer wants to follow you ignore or block. Not hard.
If the alternative is captchas, it looks like even less of a problem to me.
Brie’s last blog post..briealeida: It’s raining and . I walked to campus. Boo!
April 20th, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Well, the alternative doesn’t have to be captchas, that’s just what Adam Ostrow suggested. Do you have any other possible alternatives? Personally, I don’t like the idea of captchas in general.